Thiemo de Bakker vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. de Bakker vs B. Van De Zandschulp

Thiemo de Bakker
NED
l
w
w
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
37
Age
29
6'4" (193 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
846
C. Rank
83
40
Best Rank
22
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$785.9K
Career Money
$3.7M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
l
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
37
Age
29
6'4" (193 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
846
C. Rank
83
40
Best Rank
22
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$785.9K
Career Money
$3.7M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-To-Head: Bakker 2 - 0 Zandschulp
They have played 4 sets in total, with Thiemo de Bakker winning 4 and Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 0. The last match between Thiemo de Bakker and Botic Van De Zandschulp was at the Netherlands F3 (Middelburg), 09-07-2017, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Thiemo de Bakker getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Bakker | 2 |
Zandschulp | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(F) Netherlands F3 (Middelburg)(07-09-17)
Thiemo de Bakker
6
6
Botic Van De Zandschulp
3
4
(SF) Netherlands F1 (Alkmaar)(06-24-17)
Thiemo de Bakker
6
6
Botic Van De Zandschulp
2
1
T. d. Bakker vs B. V. D. Zandschulp H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$785,940 | Career Prize Money | $3,660,365 |
60.48% (453-296) | Career Total W/L | 61.20% (377-239) |
2 | Clay | 0 |
25 | Titles | 7 |
2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.16% (14-17) |
T. d. Bakker vs B. V. D. Zandschulp Match Preview
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Thiemo de Bakker has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 41.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Thiemo de Bakker, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 46.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 26.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Thiemo de Bakker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Botic Van De Zandschulp has saved 53.31% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Thiemo de Bakker has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 50.79% (W/L 0/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Thiemo de Bakker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 295/ 157), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 24/ 41). Botic Van De Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 93/ 55), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Thiemo de Bakker has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Botic Van De Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 54.05% of matches (W/L 20/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Thiemo de Bakker winning 2 times and Botic Van De Zandschulp being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Thiemo de Bakker winning 4 and Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 0. The last match between Thiemo de Bakker and Botic Van De Zandschulp was at the Netherlands F3 (Middelburg), 09-07-2017, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Thiemo de Bakker getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Thiemo de Bakker has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Botic Van De Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 142.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Thiemo de Bakker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Thiemo de Bakker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Botic Van De Zandschulp has converted 34.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Thiemo de Bakker vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. d. Bakker vs B. V. D. Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 0 |
24 | Games Won | 10 |
13 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:5:0 | Avg. Match Time | 1:5:0 |
64% (66/103) | 1st Serve % | 61% (65/107) |
79% (52/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (39/65) |
68% (25/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (21/42) |
33% (6/18) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/4) |
44% (47/107) | Return Pts Won % | 25% (26/103) |
100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Bakker 0%, Zandschulp 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Bakker 0%, Zandschulp 51%.
Break Points Saved %: Bakker 0%, Zandschulp 56%.
T. d. Bakker Recent Matches Played
B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

T. d. Bakker vs B. V. D. Zandschulp Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60.48% (453/296) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.20% (377/239) |
58.09% (1045/754) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.09% (862/622) |
53.02% (9158/8115) | Games Win/Loss | 53.02% (7449/6600) |
60.61% (120/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.40% (73/52) |
65.27% (295/157) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.59% (178/111) |
38.36% (28/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65.14% (114/61) |
38.46% (10/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 44.44% (12/15) |
0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
3677 | Aces Total | 3024 |
0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
841 | Total Double Faults | 2257 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:36:40 |
597.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 392.47 |
60% (22846/38127) | 1st Serve % | 62% (25246/41015) |
73% (16758/22846) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (18067/25246) |
51% (7774/15280) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7579/15772) |
41% (1410/3428) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1861/4325) |
37% (14457/38621) | Return Points Win % | 41% (17214/42372) |
36.96% (17/29) | Slam W/L | 58.93% (33/23) |
53.33% (24/21) | Masters W/L | 49.06% (26/27) |
53.33% (16/14) | Cups W/L | 60.00% (12/8) |
52.14% (73/67) | Main Tour W/L | 51.72% (75/70) |
61.81% (178/110) | Challenger W/L | 63.33% (76/44) |
72.50% (145/55) | Futures W/L | 69.82% (155/67) |
63% (429/685) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (349/560) |
38% (20/52) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 49% (21/43) |
52% (139/268) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (105/195) |
55% (131/239) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (116/203) |
84% (446/373) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (354/315) |
16% (446/72) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (354/38) |
26% (301/78) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (260/61) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
06:30 AM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
3.2
W2
1.35
06:30 AM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.53
W2
1.52
05:00 AM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.69
W2
2.04
08:00 AM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.03
W2
1.79
08:00 AM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.61
W2
2.32
05:00 AM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.19
W2
1.68
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
06:00
H2H 3-2
08:00
H2H 3-0
10:50
H2H 2-1
08:00
H2H 2-0
08:00
H2H 1-0
Tennis Events This Week
Chengdu Open - Chengdu
China
Hangzhou Open - Hangzhou
China
Laver Cup - San Francisco
United States
Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
Austria
Columbus Challenger
United States
St. Tropez Challenger
France
Targu Mures 2 Challenger
Romania
Villa Maria Challenger
Argentina
M15 Fayetteville
United States
M25 Guiyang
China
M25 Londrina
Brazil
M25 Takasaki
Japan
M25 Tamworth
Australia